@article {Tamisier4739, author = {Tamisier, Renaud and Treptow, Erika and joyeu - faure, Marie and L vy, Patrick and sapne, Marc and Benmerad, Meriem and Bailly, S{bastien and Grillet, Yves and Stach, Bruno and Muir, Jean-Fran{c c}ois and Pegliasco, Herv{e} and P{e}pin, Jean-Louis}，title ={多通道遥控干预对CPAP依从性的影响在low-cardiovascular风险睡眠呼吸暂停症状:一项随机对照试验},体积={56},数量={增刊64},elocation-id = {4739} = {2020}, doi ={国会10.1183/13993003. - 2020.4739},出版商={欧洲呼吸学会},文摘={背景:188bet官网地址治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的主要挑战之一是达到足够的持续气道正压(CPAP)依从性。我们确定了多模式远程监测干预对低心血管风险的有症状性OSA患者CPAP依从性、生活质量和功能状态的影响。研究设计与方法:在一项多中心随机对照试验中，新诊断OSA患者被随机分配到多模式远程监护(TM) 6个月与常规护理(UC)。tm包含内置的电子警报算法，用于在出现副作用、泄漏或持续残留事件时早期调整CPAP治疗。结果包括CPAP依从性、日常症状(如疲劳和困倦)和生活质量。结果:在206例年龄为50.6[42.1;58.1](中位[IQR])岁的OSA患者中，主要为男性(63%)，体重指数为30.6 [26.8;35.1]kg/m2, AHI为45.2[34.0;60.0]事件/小时，102例发生UC, 104例发生TM。6个月的治疗后,CPAPadherence相似的两组评估通过的意思是使用时间(4.73 {\ textpm} TM组的2.48小时/晚2.44小时和5.08 {\ textpm} / UC组,p = 0.30)或\ %附着到治疗的患者(通过使用4小时/晚,\ > 70 \ %的夜晚;TM的64\% vs UC的72\%，p=0.24)。在疲劳和困倦改善的效果上，两组之间没有显著差异。Interpretation: In severe OSA patients with low cardiovascular risk, multimodal telemonitoring did not increase CPAP adherence. For both TM and UC groups similar improvements in daytime symptoms were achieved.FootnotesCite this article as: European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56: Suppl. 64, 4739.This abstract was presented at the 2020 ERS International Congress, in session {\textquotedblleft}Respiratory viruses in the "pre COVID-19" era{\textquotedblright}.This is an ERS International Congress abstract. No full-text version is available. Further material to accompany this abstract may be available at www.ers-education.org (ERS member access only).}, issn = {0903-1936}, URL = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content/56/suppl_64/4739}, eprint = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content}, journal = {European Respiratory Journal} }