摘要
具体吸入激发被认为在职业性哮喘的诊断的参考标准。挑战技术来自欧洲11个中心大量增敏剂的更新手册现已推出。http://bit.ly/2XVpW1P
如果仔细进行,并在有经验的医生,具体吸入挑战(SIC)的测试广泛认为是职业性哮喘的诊断的参考标准。在2013年欧洲呼吸学会188bet官网地址委托泛欧专案组生产标准SIC与共享那些谁提供的服务中心之间的专业目的的行为和解释,并与谁希望发展新的服务中心。调查结果和工作小组的建议被刊登在欧洲呼吸杂志[1]。
与主要报告一起,我们制作了一本手册的挑战技术的大量不同的增感剂,包括那些高和低分子质量。我们承诺在5年内提供更新;这项工作已按计划完成,现作为a补充文件该社论。该技术是在那些11个专科中心使用和接触的信息对每个从业者应该需要更详细的信息中心代理类上市;在欧洲职业性哮喘社区自诩合作,并共同乐于分享自己的经验和专业知识。
Controlled, experimental SIC was first developed – formally, as a diagnostic tool for occupational asthma – around 50 years ago, in a single centre. Its practice has flourished and spread since but it is fair to say that access remains patchy, with some European countries, and many regions within them, having no provision at all. This disadvantages patients who require the highest standard of diagnostic accuracy, employers who need to know which of the agents in their workplaces is giving rise to disease in their workers, and regulators charged with controlling what is essentially a preventable disease. Moreover, it hampers the identification of novel sensitisers and the exploration of the mechanisms behind their sensitising properties; this is, perhaps, especially important in the study of chemical sensitisers and particularly so since, rightly or wrongly, they are now considered Substances of Very High Concern under REACH. For these reasons we encourage respiratory physicians and the commissioners of healthcare to familiarise themselves with the relevant guidelines and to consider the equitable provision of SIC across Europe wherever the resources to perform SIC safely and with high quality can be ensured.
补充材料
可共享PDF
脚注
这篇文章有补充材料可从www.qdcxjkg.com
利益冲突:H. Suojalehto没有什么可透露的。
利益冲突:K. Suuronen没有什么可透露的。
利益冲突:P.天玺有没有透露。
- 收到了5月23日,2019年。
- 公认2019年7月2日。
- 版权©2019人队