% 0期刊文章%雷切尔米Mercer %一个库马拉斯河岸埃莉诺Mishra % %约翰P Corcoran %一个塞勒斯Daneshvar % Rakesh K应% Tarek塞巴%一个莎拉·约翰斯通媚兰卡斯韦尔% %一个丹尼尔曼兹% Sana ahm % Mitra Shahidi %阿米莉亚O克莱夫% Manish Gautam %克里斯•奥尔顿吉尔斯考克斯% %一个朱迪斯·里昂% Nadeem Maddekar % Duneesha德丰塞卡%西蒙·巴恩斯凯瑟琳之前% %一个优雅罗宾逊%露易丝。布朗%穆罕默德Munavvar % Palav L Shah %罗伯特J Hallifax %凯文·G工%艾玛·哈德利·%一个尼克Maskell %斯蒂芬·格里%罗伯特·F·米勒%纳吉布米拉赫曼% V塞缪尔·坎普% T胸膜内的气球肋间的随机对照试验箱的下水口,以免流失位移% D J 2021% R 10.1183/13993003.01753 -2021%欧洲呼吸杂志% P 2101753 % X背景胸管位移是一种常见的临床问题,发生在9 - 42%的情况下,导致治疗失败或额外的胸膜程序赋予不必要的风险。小说胸管与一个集成的胸膜内的气球可以减少位移的风险。方法前瞻性随机对照试验比较气球排水标准治疗(12 F胸管没有气球)的主要结果客观地定义了无意的或意外的胸部位移。结果267例随机(主要结果数据,257年96.2%)。位移发生较少使用气球排水(位移5/128,3.9%;标准治疗位移13/129,10.1%),但这不是统计学意义(比值比(或)排水位移0.36,95%可信区间0.13到1.0,χ2 1 df = 2.87, p = 0.09)。调整分析占消耗的最小化因素和使用缝合了气球下水道是独立与排水管脱落率降低(调整或0.27,95%可信区间0.08到0.87,p = 0.028)。不良事件是在气球的手臂高于标准治疗手臂(气球消耗59/131,45.0%;标准治疗18/132,13.6%;χ2 1 df = 31.3, p < 0.0001)。结论气球排水减少位移与标准相比下水道使用独立的缝合,但增加专门除在排水不良事件。 The potential benefits of the novel drain should be weighed against the risks, but may be considered in practices where sutures are not routinely used.FootnotesThis manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.Conflict of interest: Dr. Mercer has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Mishra has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Banka has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Corcoran has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Daneshvar has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Panchal has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Saba has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Mrs Caswell has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Mrs Johnstone has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Menzies has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Ahmer has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Shahidi has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Clive has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Gautam has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Cox has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Orton has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Lyons has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Maddekar has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Defonseka has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Prior has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Barnes has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Robinson has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Brown has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Munavvar has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Shah has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Hallifax has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Blyth has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Mrs. Hedley has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Maskell has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Gerry has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Maskell has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Rahman reports personal fees from Rocket Medical, outside the submitted work;.Conflict of interest: Dr. Kemp has nothing to disclose. %U //www.qdcxjkg.com/content/erj/early/2021/11/25/13993003.01753-2021.full.pdf