作者@article {Laforest42 = {Laforest, l .和Van Ganse大肠Devouassoux, G . Chretin, s和奥斯曼,l . Bauguil, G和帕切科,y和昌巴,G。},标题={哮喘病人的管理监督初级保健医生或专家},体积={27}={1},页面= {42 - 50}= {2006},doi ={10.1183 / 09031936.06.00035805},出版商={欧洲呼吸学会},文摘={法国哮喘病人可能被全科医生监督(GPs)和/或专家。188bet官网地址因此,该研究调查了患者哮喘管理专门监督由专家(SPE), GPs, (GP)和(GP + SPE集团),并比较结果。哮喘患者连续招募了348年药房。每个病人完成一份调查问卷提供个人特征的数据,哮喘管理、疾病和哮喘管理的看法。哮喘控制测量使用哮喘控制测试。问卷与电脑记录的药物分发前加入这项研究。从1256例患者(平均年龄为36.1岁,54.3 \ %的女性),11.4,36.6,和52.0 \ %被安置在SPE,全科医生和全科医生+ SPE组,分别。在过去的4周,大多数病人在SPE组适当控制(52.2和26.4和21.5 \ %的全科医生和全科医生+ SPE组,分别)。SPE集团更加固定的组合使用长效β受体激动剂和吸入皮质类固醇,而接受更少的短效β受体激动剂、antitussives和抗生素。 Striking differences in symptoms and asthma management were observed according to the type of asthma supervision. The current results strongly support the need to improve the management of asthma in primary care, and the coordination of care between general practitioners and specialists.}, issn = {0903-1936}, URL = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content/27/1/42}, eprint = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content/27/1/42.full.pdf}, journal = {European Respiratory Journal} }