TY -的T1 -冠的详细比较-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab JF - European Respiratory Journal JO - Eur Respir J DO - 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020 VL - 57 IS - 4 SP - 2003961 AU - Lindner, Andreas K. AU - Nikolai, Olga AU - Kausch, Franka AU - Wintel, Mia AU - Hommes, Franziska AU - Gertler, Maximilian AU - Krüger, Lisa J. AU - Gaeddert, Mary AU - Tobian, Frank AU - Lainati, Federica AU - Köppel, Lisa AU - Seybold, Joachim AU - Corman, Victor M. AU - Drosten, Christian AU - Hofmann, Jörg AU - Sacks, Jilian A. AU - Mockenhaupt, Frank P. AU - Denkinger, Claudia M. Y1 - 2021/04/01 UR - //www.qdcxjkg.com/content/57/4/2003961.abstract N2 - A number of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are now commercially available and can result in rapid decisions on patient care, isolation and contact tracing at the point of care [1]. Two Ag-RDTs using nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples meet World Health Organization (WHO) targets and are now approved through the WHO Emergency Use Listing procedure [2–4].Supervised nasal self-sampling is a reliable alternative to professional nasopharyngeal sampling using a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test. Self-sampling and potentially patient self-testing may be a future use case. https://bit.ly/3mup0hSHeike Rössig, Chiara Manon Rohardt, Claudia Hülso, Elisabeth Linzbach, Susen Burock, Katja von dem Busche, Stephanie Padberg, Melanie Bothmann, Zümrüt Tuncer, Stefanie Lunow, Beate Zimmer, Astrid Barrera Pesek, Sabrina Pein, Nicole Buchholz, Verena Haack, Oliver Deckwart. ER -