TY - JOUR T1 -缓解氧呼吸的前景:系统回顾和综合集成摩根富林明-欧洲呼吸杂志》乔和J - 10.1183/13993003.04613 -2020欧元SP - 2004613 AU Kochovska Slavica AU -费雷拉,戴安娜h . AU -加西亚,玛雅诉AU -菲利普斯时,简l . AU -克鲁,David c . Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - //www.qdcxjkg.com/content/early/2021/02/18/13993003.04613 - 2020. -抽象N2 -氧疗法经常规定的减轻呼吸困难,尽管缺乏证据证明它对非低氧血症患者有效。本研究旨在比较和对比患者、护理人员和临床医生在缓解晚期生命受限疾病患者的慢性呼吸困难时使用姑息氧的经验，以及这如何形成处方。对定性数据进行了系统的回顾和综合分析。我们搜索了MEDLINE、CINAHL和PsycINFO的英文同行评议研究(2000年至今)，这些研究报告了在任何医疗环境下，姑息氧用于减少晚期疾病患者呼吸困难的展望。在数据提取之后，主题合成使用原始数据(引用)逐行编码，生成描述性和分析性主题。在457篇文章中，22篇文章通过报告患者(337篇)、护理者(91篇)或临床医生(616篇)的观点符合纳入标准。这些观点的共同主题是:1)姑息氧使用的好处和负担;2)对姑息性供氧使用超出指南的知识和认知;3)姑息用氧的纵向轨迹。There are differing perceptions regarding the benefits and burdens of using palliative oxygen. Clinicians should be aware that oxygen use may generate differing goals of therapy for patients and caregivers. These perceptions should be taken into consideration when prescribing oxygen for the symptomatic relief of chronic breathlessness in patients who do not quality for long term oxygen therapy.FootnotesThis manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJ online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.Conflict of interest: Dr. Lindner has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Kochovska has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Ferreira has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Ms. Garcia has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Phillips has nothing to disclose.Conflict of interest: Dr. Currow reports he is an unpaid advisory board member for Helsinn Pharmaceuticals. He is a paid consultant and receives payment for intellectual property with Mayne Pharma and is a consultant with Specialised Therapeutics Australia Pty. Ltd. ER -