作者@article {Sakamoto2000348 ={坂本,Susumu and Kataoka, Kensuke and Kondoh, Yasuhiro and Kato, Motoyasu and Okamoto, Masaki and Mukae, Hiroshi and Bando, Masashi and Suda, Takafumi and Yatera, Kazuhiro and Tanino, Yoshinori and Kishaba, Tomoo and Hattori, Noboru and Taguchi, Yoshio and Saito, Takefumi and Nishioka, Yasuhiko and Kuwano, Kazuyoshi and Kishi, Kazuma and Inase, Naohiko and Sasaki, Shinichi and Takizawa, Hajime and Johkoh, Takeshi and Sakai, Fumikazu and Homma, Sakae}, editor = {,}, title = {Pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised trial}, volume = {57}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {2000348}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1183/13993003.00348-2020}, publisher = {European Respiratory Society}, abstract = {Background A randomised controlled trial in Japan showed that inhaled N-acetylcysteine monotherapy stabilised serial decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) in some patients with early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with an antifibrotic agent and inhaled N-acetylcysteine are unknown.Methods This 48-week, randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine 352.4 mg twice daily with the results for pirfenidone alone in patients with IPF. The primary end-point was annual rate of decline in FVC. Exploratory efficacy measurements included serial change in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of acute exacerbation, and tolerability.Results 81 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine (n=41) or pirfenidone (n=40). The 48-week rate of change in FVC was -300 mL and -123 mL, respectively (difference -178 mL, 95\% CI -324{\textendash}-31 mL; p=0.018). Serial change in DLCO, 6MWD, PFS and incidence of acute exacerbation did not significantly differ between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (n=19 (55.9\%) for pirfenidone plus N-acetylcysteine; n=18 (50\%) for pirfenidone alone) was similar between groups.Conclusions Combination treatment with inhaled N-acetylcysteine and pirfenidone is likely to result in worse outcomes for IPF.We compared the efficacy of pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine with results for pirfenidone alone for IPF. Combination treatment with inhaled N-acetylcysteine and pirfenidone is likely to result in worse outcomes for IPF. https://bit.ly/3eWEbvW}, issn = {0903-1936}, URL = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content/57/1/2000348}, eprint = {//www.qdcxjkg.com/content/57/1/2000348.full.pdf}, journal = {European Respiratory Journal} }